Editorial standards
Last updated: June 2, 2026
How Owl Post is sourced
Stories come from public feeds across each category you follow. A source-diversity pass and a per-source cap keep any one outlet from dominating a briefing, so you get a spread of perspectives rather than the same handful of outlets on repeat.
AI summarization and human oversight
Digests are written by Owl Post's AI and overseen by a named editor of record, Justin Wright, who is responsible for how the system behaves and what it publishes. The AI does the reading, selecting, and summarizing at a scale no person could match each night. We are precise about this so you are never misled: Owl Post does not claim that a human writes or hand-checks every story. The accountable human sets the standards on this page and answers for the result.
Accuracy and the no-fabrication rule
We summarize real reporting. We never invent facts, quotes, or sources. When the feeds return nothing reliable in the freshness window, the digest says so rather than filling space with noise. If a summary is wrong, we want to fix it. See our corrections policy.
Attribution
Every story links to the original publisher, and that publisher remains the named source in our markup. Owl Post curates and links. It does not republish article bodies or claim another outlet's reporting as its own.
Personalization and voice
Your digest is written in a voice you choose, along a spectrum from fast and punchy to deep and analytical. Voice shapes tone and rhythm. It never changes the facts.
Report an error
Spotted a mistake in a summary? Here is how we handle corrections.