Technology

AI & Machine Learning

Models, breakthroughs, and the race to AGI

Stories
200
stories
Sources
19
sources
Page
Page 4 of 10
Updated hourly

Why Owl Post covers AI & Machine Learning

AI moves faster than any single feed can keep up with. Frontier model releases, new benchmarks, capability scares, regulation moves, and the steady drip of papers that actually matter — the signal-to-noise ratio is brutal, and most coverage is either uncritical hype or reflexive doomerism. Owl Post reads across hundreds of sources every day, filters out the takes that don't pass smell tests, and surfaces what genuinely shifted: model releases worth paying attention to, capability jumps with real-world implications, and policy moves with teeth.

The voice you read it in is yours. Pick a deep, contextualized voice if you want explanations that respect a smart audience without dumbing down. Pick a measured, analytical voice if you want context and nuance over hot takes. Pick a sober, no-hype voice if you want the analyst's read on what's real. Same news, the way you actually like to read it.

Three to five stories every weekday morning. Written in your voice. In your inbox. In 3 minutes.

Get your free digestSee a sample
Featured

ShadowLab: A Modular C2 Framework Architecture Built with Python for Modern Cybersecurity Research

Introduction: The Engineering Paradigm of “Building” in Cybersecurity Research The discipline of cybersecurity diverges radically from traditional software engineering workflows. Merely operating a system or analyzing its vulnerabilities is often insufficient to fully comprehend its underlying operational mechanics. True expertise stems from grasping the core architecture at the heart of offensive and defensive strategies — by building that system entirely from scratch. Driven by this engineering paradigm, I developed the ShadowLab framework to decode the detection mechanisms of modern EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) and antivirus systems, delve into the intricacies of network protocols, and bridge the gap between theory and practice in secure communication channels. ShadowLab is far more than a conventional Remote Access Trojan (RAT); it is an advanced research platform that integrates asynchronous network traffic, end-to-end encryption, and modular payload architectures. Throughout this technical paper, I will detail the architectural design choices, the engineering bottlenecks encountered while establishing a Python-based Command & Control (C2) infrastructure, and how I centered the principles of “ethical engineering” at the core of cybersecurity research. ShadowLab is a product of the conviction that offensive simulations yield meaningful insights only when executed through a transparent, modular, and ethically grounded framework. ⚠️ DISCLAIMER: This project is designed exclusively for educational and research purposes. Unauthorized operations on remote systems are strictly prohibited, and all legal liability resides entirely with the user. When designing the ShadowLab framework, I implemented a modular architecture anchored in Clean Architecture principles. This structural approach drastically enhances system maintainability while optimizing debugging, minimizing technical debt, and streamlining the integration of new functional modules. Decoupling the co

dev.to
ShadowLab: A Modular C2 Framework Architecture Built with Python for Modern Cybersecurity Research

How I Built an AI Agent That Watches My Logs and Opens Pull Requests While I Sleep 😴🤖

As a developer, there are few things more anxiety-inducing than the Slack notification sound at 3:00 AM: "Production is down." You groggily open your laptop, pull up the server logs, trace the exception through 5 different files, fix a missing try/catch block, push the hotfix, and try to go back to sleep. I got tired of this. As an engineer obsessed with automation, I decided to build something that solves the problem for me. Enter AutoFixer-Agent. AutoFixer is an autonomous AI agent (built with Python) that watches your production server logs in real-time. When it detects a crash or an exception, it doesn't just alert you — it investigates the stack trace, finds the exact bug in your codebase, generates a contextual fix using LLMs, and automatically opens a Pull Request on GitHub. You wake up to a PR waiting for review, not a broken production environment. ✅ The architecture is surprisingly simple but immensely powerful: The Log Watcher: A background Python daemon constantly tails your error.log. The Brain (LLM Orchestration): When an exception is thrown, the agent captures the stack trace and uses the Google Gemini API to analyze the root cause. It maps the error back to the specific line of code in the repository. The Fixer: The agent generates a drop-in replacement block of code. The GitHub Bot: Using GitHub Actions and the GitHub CLI, the agent branches off main, applies the fix locally, runs sanity checks, and pushes a new Pull Request with a detailed explanation of the bug. The hardest part wasn't generating the code — LLMs are great at that now. The hardest part was building the context window. If a generic KeyError happens, the LLM needs to know what dictionary it came from. A naked stack trace is not enough. python # Bad prompt (hallucination-prone): "Fix this error: KeyError: 'user_id'" # Good prompt (context-aware): "Fix this error: KeyError: 'user_id' Surrounding code (lines 45-95 of auth/handler.py): ... def process_request(payload): user = payload['us

dev.to

Bun for AI agents: where the speed actually shows up (and where it lies)

Bun is fast. The README will tell you 4x on bun install, 3-5x on Bun.serve(), 2x on bun:sqlite. Some of this matters for AI agents. Some of it doesn't. We've been running production agents on Bun for about 3 months — a mix of Hono-on-Bun HTTP agents and standalone Bun scripts called from Claude Code and OpenClaw. This post is what we'd tell ourselves 3 months ago about where Bun actually helps and where it bites. Agents are spawned. A lot. Every Claude Code hook, every npx invocation, every cron-fired worker. Node's startup is ~80-120ms cold; Bun's is ~15-25ms. For interactive agent loops where the user is waiting on a hook to populate context, that's a noticeable UX difference. The pre-task hook that takes 250ms to do its retrieval feels totally different when the runtime ate 100ms vs 20ms of that budget. This is the strongest case for Bun in agent workflows. Concrete win. bun install for ephemeral agent containers If you spin up containerized agents (Daytona, E2B, Modal, your own ECS task), each cold container does a package install. npm install on a fresh container is 30-90s; bun install is 5-15s. Over thousands of agent runs per day, that's real money. For Workers / serverless / persistent processes, this doesn't matter — you only install once. bun:sqlite for local agent memory If you're building a per-agent local cache (recent tool calls, recently-seen embeddings, scratchpad state), bun:sqlite is genuinely 2x faster than better-sqlite3 on simple selects. It's also zero-install — no native bindings to compile, no Python build chain, just import { Database } from 'bun:sqlite'. If your agent runs on a Bun runtime AND uses SQLite for state, the math works. If you're on Node, just use better-sqlite3. The agent is going to wait 800-4000ms for the LLM to respond. The 50ms of runtime overhead you saved is round-off. Your bottleneck is the model, not the runtime. This is the comeback to every "Bun is 4x faster" benchmark in an agent context — the agent's wall-clock is d

dev.to

Hermes Agent: Why Open-Source AI Agents Are Changing How We Build Software.

Hermes Agent: Why Open-Source AI Agents Are Changing How We Build Software Introduction Artificial intelligence has moved far beyond simple chatbots. Today, developers are building systems that can reason through problems, use tools, execute tasks, and make decisions across multiple steps. These systems are commonly known as AI agents. Recently, I explored Hermes Agent, an open-source agentic framework designed to run on your own infrastructure while providing advanced capabilities such as planning, tool usage, and multi-step reasoning. After spending time understanding how it works, I came away with a greater appreciation for the role open-source agents may play in the future of software development. In this article, I'll explain what Hermes Agent is, what makes it interesting, and why developers should pay attention to the growing ecosystem of open-source AI agents. What Is Hermes Agent? Hermes Agent is an open-source agent framework designed to perform tasks that require more than a single response from a language model. Instead of simply answering questions, Hermes Agent can: Break down complex objectives into smaller steps Use external tools when necessary Maintain context across multiple actions Perform reasoning before taking action Execute workflows autonomously This approach allows developers to build systems capable of handling real-world tasks that would normally require human intervention. For example, rather than asking an AI to summarize a document, you could instruct an agent to: Find relevant documents. Analyze their contents. Extract key insights. Generate a report. Save the results to a specified location. The agent coordinates each step as part of a larger workflow. Why Open Source Matters One of the most compelling aspects of Hermes Agent is that it is open source. Many powerful AI tools today operate behind closed platforms where developers have limited visibility into how systems work. Open-source alternatives provide several advantages: Transp

dev.to

I Pointed Chrome's Prompt API at a 1.25 Million Character Memoir, and It Got Interesting Fast

Hello, I'm Shrijith Venkatramana. I'm building git-lrc, an AI code reviewer that runs on every commit. Star Us to help devs discover the project. Do give it a try and share your feedback for improving the product. A straightforward engineering question: what happens when you feed a long book to an on-device language model in Chrome and start adjusting the parameters? To explore this, I built a small experiment called Gemini Nano Book Lab: a Chrome extension sidepanel that uses Chrome’s built-in Prompt API to answer questions about Richard Wagner’s My Life, while also exposing some of the underlying mechanics. The response is only part of it. The experiment also captures: Model download behavior Retrieval cost Time to first token Context window pressure Effects of different chunking strategies Places where the API works well, and where its limits become obvious If you’re an engineer interested in systems that have rough edges—and therefore teach you something—this is a useful area to explore. Chrome’s Prompt API is part of the browser’s built-in AI features. Instead of sending prompts to a cloud endpoint, a web app or extension can request an on-device language model session and prompt it locally. Resources: The Prompt API Session management best practices Structured output for the Prompt API Built-in model management in Chrome Debug Gemini Nano Core capabilities: Local inference Streaming results Availability check before session creation Context usage measurement Events like contextoverflow (In some environments) sampling parameters like temperature and top-k This makes it more than a simple text box—it becomes an environment for experimentation. Long inputs expose the interesting problems. Short prompts hide a lot; a paragraph‑long demo can make any model look magical. A long corpus forces concrete decisions: What chunk size works well? Should chunks overlap? How many chunks should you retrieve? What latency comes from retrieval vs. prompting? How much of the cont

dev.to

The Ota Skill for AI Agents

Overview We built the Ota skill because too much "AI repo automation" is still fake confidence. An agent clones a repo, finds a plausible command, edits the right file, and looks smart right up until it does something expensive and stupid. It runs the wrong test path. It installs tools globally because local setup was unclear. It patches around a missing service as if the repo were healthy. That failure is usually blamed on the model. Most of the time it is a repo problem. The repository never made its real operating path explicit enough for the agent to follow without guessing. Ota already gives the repo a machine-readable contract through ota.yaml. The skill exists to teach agents how to behave around that contract: what to trust, what to run, and when to stop instead of improvising. It is not a replacement for ota.yaml. It is not an MCP server. It is not a hidden automation layer. It is the missing operating guide for agents working in Ota repos. We kept seeing the same pattern: the agent was fast, but the repo was vague. Without a repo-specific operating guide, an agent may see several possible paths: run the command from the README copy the command from CI infer setup from package.json, pyproject.toml, or go.mod run a broad test command because it looks conventional install tools globally because a local command failed patch around a missing service instead of identifying the readiness gap Some of those choices work. Some are dangerous. Some look fine locally and still miss the only verification path that matters. Our view is simple: if a repo has ota.yaml, that file should beat README prose, shell folklore, and whatever command happens to look familiar. Declared tasks, writable paths, setup requirements, and validation commands should be treated as contract facts. The skill exists to make that behavior explicit across agents that support skills. The official skill lives in ota-run/skills. It is aimed at the work that actually shows up in live repos: authoring

dev.to

How This 2-Person Y-combinator backed Team Built "AWS for AI Agents" - $500k raised - Tech breakdown

Hey I'm Omkar yoooo Owner of FounderDeepDives and I'm doing a series where we introduce YC backed startups and their founders and the core technology they're working on so let's get started lesgooo TL;DR Truffle Al (YC W25) is a Bengaluru/SF-based developer platform that turns Al agents into plug-and-play APIs, letting engineers integrate customer support agents into WhatsApp or analytics agents into Slack with just a few lines of TypeScript code. The company raised $500K seed from Y Combinator in February 2025 and is tackling the reality that developers spend 60% of their time on infrastructure "glue code" instead of building actual Al solutions. Founded by Shaunak Srivastava (ex-CMU GenAl and 3D Research, Hyperverge) and Rahul Karajgikar (ex-AWS OpenSearch SDE-2), Truffle abstracts state management, memory, vector databases, tool integration, and deployment infrastructure. *The Problem Space: Why Al Agent Production is Actually Hard Most people think "just call an LLM API and you're done." If you've built production Al agents, you know that's bullshit. The real bottleneck isn't model access it's the infrastructure overhead. Developers need to handle state management with checkpointing and thread persistence, memory systems for both short-term sliding windows and long-term vector storage, vector databases with embedding pipelines and indexing, tool integrations with OAuth flows for Gmail, GitHub, Notion, Slack with rate limiting and error handling, and deployment infrastructure for containerization, scaling, monitoring, and cost tracking. This is why companies burn $100K to $200K per year on DevOps overhead just to manage Al agent infrastructure. A $100K vendor quote typically translates to $140K to $160K in actual Year 1 costs when you account for hidden maintenance, model retraining, and security audits. The industry data confirms this: developers spend 60% of their time on glue code instead of building actual Al solutions. Most Al projects never make it to produ

dev.to

Inside the XRPL AI Red Team: What We've Found and Fixed

Back in March, we announced that Ripple was standing up a dedicated AI-assisted red team to continuously hunt for vulnerabilities in the XRP Ledger. Two months in, we want to give the community a real look under the hood: how the effort is structured, what kinds of bugs we've found, and what we've learned along the way. The XRPL has been running continuously since 2012 and has processed over three billion transactions. That track record is something to be proud of, but it also means the codebase carries the weight of a decade of engineering evolution - design decisions made at a different scale, assumptions that predate modern tooling, and legacy patterns that interact in non-obvious ways with newer features. New features ship regularly, each adding complexity across the core protocol, client SDKs, and the Clio API server. A codebase that has evolved over a decade accumulates subtle interactions between subsystems that no single person can hold entirely in their head. AI models allow us to go both deeper and broader in larger codebases, at a speed and scale that would otherwise be near-impossible. Teams can thoroughly explore large codebases at a depth and breadth that would be impractical with manual review alone, finding edge cases where subsystems intersect and in sections of the codebase that haven’t been closely scrutinized in years. The red team combines several complementary techniques, each catching different classes of bugs. AI bug-finding agents. The core of our approach is custom AI pipelines that analyze the rippled codebase, XRPL client SDKs (xrpl.js, xrpl-py, xrpl4j, xrpl-rust, xrpl-go), and Clio. We run these agents against feature branches, release candidates, and the main codebase on a continuous basis, including scheduled weekly runs against the develop branch to catch bugs introduced by new code. DepthFirst. We use DepthFirst, an AI-powered vulnerability discovery platform, for deep scans of our repositories. While our custom pipelines are purpose

dev.to
Quack-Mate: a chess engine in SQL

Quack-Mate: a chess engine in SQL

We have all seen SQL pushed past its comfort zone to build things like 3D renderers or cellular automata. Naturally, I wondered about a classic computer science challenge: could you write a functional chess engine purely inside an analytical database using standard relational algebra? The answer is yes. In fact, you can express the entire engine—generating moves, validating legality, scoring positions, and bubbling up the best strategy—inside a single WITH RECURSIVE query. Recursive CTEs can handle a minimax tree search, just like the recursive minimax algorithm is implemented with imperative languages. By combining a top-down expansion of the board states with a bottom-up aggregation pass, DuckDB can execute a full minimax-based move search natively: WITH RECURSIVE -- Expansion CTE: Top-down search_tree AS ( -- Expansion base case: Root Node SELECT id, state, 0 as depth, is_white_turn FROM root UNION ALL -- Expansion step SELECT child.id, child.state, parent.depth + 1, child.is_white_turn FROM search_tree parent JOIN possible_moves child ON ... WHERE parent.depth < MAX_DEPTH ), -- Minimax CTE: Bottom-up minimax AS ( -- Back-propagation base case: -- Target depth or terminal nodes SELECT id, parent_id, depth, static_eval(state) as score, 0 as step FROM search_tree s WHERE s.depth = MAX_DEPTH OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM search_tree child WHERE child.parent_id = s.id) UNION ALL -- Back-propagation step SELECT parent.id, parent.parent_id, parent.depth, CASE WHEN parent.is_white_turn THEN MAX(child.score) -- White maximises ELSE MIN(child.score) -- Black minimises END as score, prev.step + 1 as step FROM (SELECT DISTINCT step FROM minimax) prev JOIN search_tree parent ON parent.depth = MAX_DEPTH - (prev.step + 1) JOIN recurring.minimax child ON child.parent_id = parent.id GROUP BY parent.id, parent.parent_id, parent.depth, parent.is_white_turn, prev.step ) SELECT score FROM minimax WHERE depth = 0; This query is obviously slightly simplified, but the structure is that

dev.to

⚔️ Crash #4: The Emulator War

⚔️ Crash #4: The Emulator War "I just deleted a game emulator. Why is my AI assistant dead?" Months before I fell down the AI rabbit hole, I installed an Android emulator on my laptop. You know the type — "this phone game would look better on a bigger screen." Harmless decision. Right? I played for a few weeks. Got bored. Uninstalled. Forgot about it completely. Fast forward three months. I am deep in my AI rabbit hole. WSL2 is running. My local models are humming. I have achieved things. Then one morning I open the terminal, type a command, and Windows spits this at me: HCS_E_SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE I stare at the screen. Then I stare harder. Nothing changes. For those of you who, like me, did not major in computer science: this error means virtualization broke. The thing that lets your Linux subsystem exist inside Windows? Gone. Poof. No explanation. I did not install anything new. I did not change settings. I literally just woke up, made coffee, sat down, and my computer had decided to betray me while I was sleeping. Here is what "debugging" looks like when you are not a developer: Google the error code Read three forum posts in languages you barely understand Try the first solution → nothing Try the second solution → worse Restart the computer → still broken Stare at the ceiling Try solution three → computer freezes Restart again Type the same error into Google with slightly different words Find a Reddit thread from 2021 with two upvotes Try that guy's solution → IT WORKS Two hours. Twelve browser tabs. One Reddit hero from 2021 who will never know he saved my sanity. Remember that Android emulator I uninstalled months ago? It had hijacked Windows' virtualization layer — the same layer WSL2 needs to run. When I deleted the emulator, it didn't clean up after itself. It left a wound in the system. And that wound festered for months until one day it just... collapsed. The emulator and WSL2 were never supposed to share a computer. They were fighting over the same reso

dev.to

Why Jira Is Still the Best Tool for Defect Monitoring and Complex Task Management

Modern software teams move fast. Features are released continuously, bugs need immediate attention, and projects often involve multiple teams working together. In this environment, having a proper workflow management system becomes essential. That’s where Jira by Atlassian stands out. At first glance, Jira may look like just another issue tracker. But once you start working on real projects, especially large-scale ones, its depth becomes obvious. From defect monitoring to sprint planning and advanced issue tracking through JQL, Jira helps teams stay organized even in highly complex workflows. Jira was originally designed for bug and issue tracking, and that remains one of its strongest areas. A typical bug workflow in Jira looks something like this: Open → In Progress → QA Testing → Resolved → Closed This structure gives teams complete visibility into: Which bugs are open Who is working on them How long issues remain unresolved Which defects are critical Jira also allows teams to attach: Screenshots Error logs Stack traces Videos Comments Everything stays centralized inside a single ticket, making communication between QA and developers much smoother. One of the biggest advantages is traceability. Bugs can be linked directly to: User stories Pull requests Deployments Releases This makes debugging and tracking significantly easier in large projects. Jira is not just for bugs. It handles complex project structures extremely well through its hierarchy system: Epic → Story → Task → Sub-task → Bug This helps teams break large projects into smaller manageable pieces. For example: Launch New Payment System Add UPI support Add card tokenization Improve checkout UI Create API endpoints Design database schema Build frontend integration This structure keeps technical work aligned with business goals. Jira provides both: Scrum boards Kanban boards Scrum boards are useful for sprint-based development with features like: Sprint planning Story points Burndown charts Velocity track

dev.to

AI API Token Cost Optimization: From $500 to $50 per Month with Next.js 16

AI API Token Cost Optimization: From $500 to $50 per Month with Next.js 16 I've seen an AI writing tool with fewer than 2,000 monthly active users burning $487/month on API costs. After systematic optimization, that dropped to $52—an 89% reduction—with no noticeable quality loss. Bloated System Prompts — 500 tokens of "you are an expert..." fluff per request Full Conversation History — passing the entire 10-turn dialog every time No Caching — regenerating identical answers to common questions Big Models for Small Tasks — using Opus for spelling checks Blind Retries — retrying 5x on every network hiccup Unbounded Output — no max_tokens, letting the model ramble Ignoring Cheap Alternatives — not using GPT-4o-mini or open-source models Instead of a 500-token universal system prompt, build task-specific minimal context: const BASE_PROMPTS = { writing: "You are a writing assistant. Be concise and professional.", coding: "You are a code expert. Provide runnable TypeScript.", analysis: "You are a data analyst. Use data to support claims.", }; Result: 500 tokens → 30-80 tokens. 85% savings per request. Traditional exact-match cache hit rates are terrible. Use embedding similarity: const SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD = 0.92; // Cache hit when user asks "What is SEO?" vs "Explain search engine optimization" Our production semantic cache hits 34% of requests—one third of all API calls eliminated. Not every task needs GPT-4o: Task Model Cost/1K tokens Translation, spell-check GPT-4o-mini $0.00015 Article writing GPT-4o $0.0025 Architecture design Claude Opus $0.015 An intelligent router classifier reduced costs by 70% on simple tasks. Add max_tokens limits per intent (summary=200, article=3000) Use exponential backoff with jitter for retries (only on 429/503, never on 401/400) Stream tokens with real-time counting to detect budget overruns early export class TokenTracker { getHourlyCost() { /* alert if > $5/hour */ } getDailyReport() { /* per-model breakdown */ } } Metric Before After S

dev.to

Nexthena app

Built a local-first AI whiteboard app — free on Windows/Linux, $2 one-time on macOS [OC] Hey all — I built Nexthena, a desktop whiteboard that runs entirely on your machine. No account required, no cloud sync, completely offline capable. Why local-first? The AI part: Full feature list: Create from scratch, local files, or templates (flowcharts, sequence diagrams) AI generation from text prompts Excalidraw-compatible shape library File search, trash & restore, export to image/file Light/dark mode, keyboard shortcuts Windows, macOS, Linux Pricing: Would love feedback — especially from Mac users on whether $2 feels right or not. WebSite: https://blackstar-baba.github.io/nexthena-doc/

dev.to

No Template Fits? Generate Your Own Awesome DESIGN.md with .NET and Ollama

Introduction I found that lots of excellent DESIGN.md examples are already available in this awesome repo: https://github.com/VoltAgent/awesome-design-md Light introduction: this repository is a curated collection of ready-to-use DESIGN.md files extracted from real websites, designed to help AI agents generate UI with better visual consistency. Big credit to the maintainers and contributors of awesome-design-md for pushing this direction forward and making design-system knowledge easier to reuse. That said, sometimes I want to build something not included in the repository. Especially when I am in an old-school mood and want a retro flavor that is uniquely mine. ;) So in this tutorial, we build a fun experiment: a custom DESIGN.md generator app in C#. The app will: Crawl a target page. Extract visual tokens (colors, fonts, semantic classes). Ask LLM to synthesize a full DESIGN.md. Ask LLM to generate a verification index.html from that DESIGN.md. Save both files locally. We will use: .NET 8 OllamaSharp http://localhost:11434 nemotron-3-super:cloud Target URL -> DesignMdGenerator.CrawlAndExtractMetadataAsync -> tokenized design metadata (title/colors/fonts/classes) -> Ollama (nemotron-3-super:cloud) -> DESIGN.md -> Ollama verification round -> index.html -> save to Output/DesignMdGenerator Visual Studio or VS Code .NET 8 SDK Ollama running locally Model available in your Ollama environment Run Ollama with the model used in this demo: ollama run nemotron-3-super:cloud If your Ollama service is already running at http://localhost:11434, you are good. dotnet new console -n DesignMdGeneratorDemo cd DesignMdGeneratorDemo dotnet add package OllamaSharp Your .csproj should include at least: Exe net8.0 enable enable Program.cs This version is focused only on the DESIGN.md demo flow. using DesignMdGeneratorDemo.Services; Console.OutputEncoding = System.Text.Encoding.UTF8; string targetUrl = args.Length > 0 ? args[0] : "https://www.yahoo.com"; string modelName = args.Length >

dev.to

DeepSeek API Complete Guide: Setup, Pricing, and Best Practices

DeepSeek API Complete Guide: Setup, Pricing, and Best Practices Why DeepSeek API is Gaining Traction Among DevelopersIf you've been following the AI landscape, you've likely heard about DeepSeek. This open-weight model has been making waves for its impressive performance on reasoning tasks, coding, and mathematical problem-solving—often rivaling much larger proprietary models at a fraction of the cost. For developers, the DeepSeek API opens up a world of possibilities without requiring you to self-host a massive model.In this DeepSeek API guide, we'll walk through everything you need to get started: from your first API call to understanding the pricing structure, and some best practices I've picked up along the way. Whether you're building a coding assistant, a chatbot, or just experimenting, this DeepSeek tutorial will have you operational in minutes.## Getting Started: DeepSeek Setup in Under 5 MinutesThe DeepSeek setup process is refreshingly straightforward. Unlike some APIs that require complex authentication flows, DeepSeek follows the familiar OpenAI-compatible format, which means if you've worked with GPT APIs before, you're already 90% of the way there.### Step 1: Get Your API Key- Head to the DeepSeek platform and create an account.- Navigate to the API section in your dashboard.- Generate a new API key. Copy it immediately—you won't be able to see it again.### Step 2: Make Your First API CallHere's a simple Python example using the requests library. This is the core of any DeepSeek API guide—a clean, working snippet you can run right away: import requests import jsonurl = "https://api.deepseek.com/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_DEEPSEEK_API_KEY", "Content-Type": "application/json" }payload = { "model": "deepseek-chat", "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful coding assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Write a Python function to check if a string is a palindrome."} ], "temperature": 0.7, "max_tokens

dev.to

Dev Opportunity Radar #1: A $100K AI Grant, Two Fellowships, and an AI Agent Resource

TL;DR I've missed a lot of opportunities simply because I didn't know they existed. So every Friday, I'll share opportunities, programs, events, resources, and other interesting finds that I come across. I know I'll miss things, so if you discover something worth sharing, drop it in the comments. If I feature your find in a future edition, I'll make sure to credit you. If you discovered it, the recognition belongs to you. Hopefully this becomes less of my radar and more of our radar over time. This week's edition includes a contributor-focused fellowship, a $100,000 AI research grant, a founder fellowship, and a resource for people interested in building AI agents. ⚡ Quick Scan Flow Fellowship Interactivity Research Grants by Thinking Machines Commit Fellowship Hands-on AI Agents 🧭 Why I'm Starting This 🤝 Let's Build This Together 🌟 Community Finds 👋 Until Next Friday Opportunity Organization Type Deadline Flow Fellowship Flow Research Fellowship May 31 Interactivity Research Grants Thinking Machines Research Grant ($100K) June 19, 2026 Commit Fellowship MLH & Transcend Network Founder Fellowship May 31 Resource Highlight: Hands-on AI Agents - a free book and code repository for learning modern AI agent frameworks. Here are a few opportunities I came across this week that I thought were worth sharing. Who it's for: People interested in contributing to projects across AI, product, research, systems, content, and media. What stands out: Unlike many programs that focus primarily on learning, this fellowship focuses on contributing to real projects and shipping public work. Format: 12-week cohort with mentorship and project contributions. Location: Global Deadline: May 31 🔗 Learn More | Apply Who it's for: Researchers exploring human-AI interaction and collaboration. What stands out: Up to $100,000 in funding plus $25,000 in Tinker credits for projects focused on improving how humans and AI work together. Areas of interest: Multimodal interaction, generative UI, AI

dev.to

How I Built 15 SEO Tool Sites Solo: My GEO Content Factory SOP

I started building English tool sites in early 2026. The goal was simple: build sites that get indexed by both Google AND AI Overviews, with minimum cost. 4 months later, I have 15 tool sites under one domain (deepfms.com) — converters, dev tools, USB-C calculators. Some are doing 200+ daily PV. Some got cited by AI Overview within days. Here's my complete SOP, soup to nuts. KGR = allintitle results ÷ monthly search volume KGR 1: Don't bother. Established sites own the SERP. Start with a scenario, not a tool ❌ "I want to build a PDF compressor" ✅ "What online tools do people need when building a resume?" Pull keyword lists — SEMrush, Ahrefs, or free tools like Ubersuggest Manually check Google's top 10 — If the top results are old/broken sites, that's your signal Calculate KGR — Filter for <0.25 Reverse-engineer low-authority competitors — Find their feature gaps Real Keyword Examples (All KGR < 0.25) Keyword KGR Verdict usb-c to ethernet adapter not working 0.12 ✅ Go usb-c docking station keeps disconnecting 0.08 ✅ Go usb-c cable types explained 0.18 ✅ Go Once you pick a keyword, don't write a blog post. Build a tool page instead. AI loves tools: When someone searches "convert kg to lbs", AI Overviews cite a working converter, not a 2000-word article Higher dwell time: Open tool → use → copy result. That's 40+ seconds of engagement. Google favors utility: Core Web Vitals updates have been kind to tool pages over content-only pages Static HTML + CSS + JS → Single page app CSS variables (dark/light mode) JSON-LD structured data (WebApplication Schema) 100% frontend, zero server cost Every tool is a single .html file. Self-contained. No framework, no build step. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) isn't replacing SEO. It's complementing it. SEO targets Google rankings. GEO targets AI Overview citations. 1. ✅ Meta Description (120-160 chars, natural keyword inclusion) 2. ✅ Unique H1 (core keyword in question format) 3. ✅ GEO Summary (H2 sections that answer directly)

dev.to

Keeping Claude Code Context Alive Across a Desktop, a Laptop, and a VPS

I work from two computers — a desktop during the day, a laptop at night. Both run Claude Code. Both need to know what the other one did. For months the answer was "tell the second machine what you did on the first," which is exactly the kind of chore that eventually kills a workflow. This is the setup that finally replaced all the manual context-passing. It's not clever, but it works, and I haven't lost a thread in about six weeks. My name is Fillip Kosorukov. I'm a solo founder building a couple of SaaS products, none of which would ship without AI-assisted coding. Everything here runs on Ubuntu, Python 3, and a small pile of shell scripts. Claude Code has session memory inside a given conversation, and per-project CLAUDE.md files that travel with the repo. What it doesn't have, out of the box, is a durable cross-machine working memory — the sort of thing where you can tell it "we decided X yesterday on the other computer" and it already knows. My fix has three parts: A knowledge directory on the VPS that every machine syncs to (~/knowledge/) A session-end hook that auto-commits and pushes that directory A startup ritual that pulls the latest state and reads the recent CHANGELOG The ritual takes less than a minute on either machine and gives the assistant a useful cold-start state. ~/knowledge/ ├── INDEX.md ├── CHANGELOG.md # append-only, every agent writes when finishing meaningful work ├── scratch.md # Karpathy append-and-review note ├── meta/ │ └── sources-of-truth.md # which file owns which category of information ├── / │ ├── rules.md # durable behavior rules │ ├── hypotheses.md # unconfirmed patterns │ ├── knowledge.md # confirmed facts │ ├── decisions/YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md │ └── raw/ # ingested source material Nothing special. Markdown I can grep. That's the point. When I want to know whether a fact exists, I can ripgrep the tree from any machine in any shell. The VPS is the source of truth. Desktop and laptop are clones. Git does the heavy lifting. On each mac

dev.to

Get AI & Machine Learning delivered to your inbox

Owl Post delivers a personalized ai & machine learning digest every morning, curated by AI, written in your voice.

Get your free digest
See a sample AI & Machine Learning digest →
More in Technology