Technology

AI & Machine Learning

Models, breakthroughs, and the race to AGI

Stories
200
stories
Sources
19
sources
Page
Page 6 of 10
Updated hourly

Why Owl Post covers AI & Machine Learning

AI moves faster than any single feed can keep up with. Frontier model releases, new benchmarks, capability scares, regulation moves, and the steady drip of papers that actually matter โ€” the signal-to-noise ratio is brutal, and most coverage is either uncritical hype or reflexive doomerism. Owl Post reads across hundreds of sources every day, filters out the takes that don't pass smell tests, and surfaces what genuinely shifted: model releases worth paying attention to, capability jumps with real-world implications, and policy moves with teeth.

The voice you read it in is yours. Pick a deep, contextualized voice if you want explanations that respect a smart audience without dumbing down. Pick a measured, analytical voice if you want context and nuance over hot takes. Pick a sober, no-hype voice if you want the analyst's read on what's real. Same news, the way you actually like to read it.

Three to five stories every weekday morning. Written in your voice. In your inbox. In 3 minutes.

Get your free digestSee a sample

From "Who Wrote This?" to "Provenance, Actioned": Making AI-origin code obvious during review

TL;DR: The most useful provenance is actionable provenance. Instead of storing prompts like a dusty audit log, surface them where decision-makers work: the code review. Recent UX and correlation work in LineageLens โ€” sidebar captures, drag/drop, click-to-insert, and a confidence engine โ€” demonstrate how provenance can shorten review cycles and reduce reverts. UX trade-offs and governance constraints Confidence thresholds: too low โ†’ noisy provenance, too high โ†’ missed attributions. Tune by starting conservative (show medium/high only) and lower threshold based on false-negative feedback. Privacy and storage: prompts can be sensitive. Default to workspace-local storage and make PR annotation an explicit reviewer action. Reviewer training: a short guideline (one paragraph) in your PR template โ€” "If provenance shows 'high confidence', prefer triage over revert" โ€” makes a measurable difference. Quick checklist to evaluate your team's readiness Are prompts stored in your control plane or vendor logs? If not, you may lack necessary evidence. Can you surface provenance inline in PRs or via your editor? If not, archival logs won't help reviewers. Do you have a workflow for annotating PRs with provenance? If not, create a two-line PR template snippet now.

dev.to
Why I'm building an AI commerce engine that shows its work (and how you can help)

Why I'm building an AI commerce engine that shows its work (and how you can help)

Hey devs ๐Ÿ‘‹ I'm Nitish โ€” a full-stack developer and AI automation engineer. For the past 7 years, I've built SaaS platforms, AI agents, and e-commerce integrations for startups and agencies. And I kept seeing the same problem: Most "AI commerce tools" aren't actually AI. They're if-then scripts wrapped in a chat UI. They drain budgets with unpredictable credits. They hide decisions behind black boxes you can't audit. So I decided to build the antidote. Introducing ClarityCommerce โ€” an AI commerce engine built on genuine reasoning, not rules. The Tech Stack (so far): Next.js 15 (App Router) + TypeScript Multi-model AI router: DeepSeek V3.2 (primary), Gemini 2.5 Pro / Claude 4 Sonnet (fallback) Cost-aware token routing: auto-downgrade to cheaper models when margin <70% Zod + Server Actions + Resend for waitlist flow Vercel Edge Functions + Cloudflare for global low-latency Explainable AI Dashboard: every decision leaves a verifiable trail Why this matters: Sellers get transparency: see why the AI recommended a price change Founders get predictability: flat-rate pricing, no credit anxiety Devs get control: open architecture, clear API contracts, no vendor lock-in I'm writing this because: I want brutal feedback on the architecture before we scale I'm looking for 5-10 technical co-builders for the MVP phase I believe the future of AI commerce is explainable, compliant, and affordable โ€” and I'd rather build it in public than in silence If you're a developer, AI engineer, or technical founder: What would you change about this stack? Have you built explainable AI systems before? What worked? Would you use a commerce AI that showed you its decision trail? Drop your thoughts below ๐Ÿ‘‡ I read every comment. Want to follow the build or join the beta? https://claritycommerce.nitishkumar.pro/ โ†’ My portfolio (past SaaS/AI work): https://www.nitishkumar.pro/ Built with transparency. โ€” Nitish BuildInPublic #AI #Ecommerce #NextJS #TypeScript #LangChain #DevCommunity #IndieHackers #Sa

dev.to

Top MCP Servers Every Developer Should Install in 2026

MCP (Model Context Protocol) hit 97 million SDK downloads per month in early 2026 - up from just 2 million when it launched in late 2024. Every major AI coding platform now supports it: Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code Copilot, and JetBrains AI. The public registry has crossed 9,400 servers. But most MCP guides either list servers without context or go too deep into the spec. This guide focuses on what's actually worth installing, how to set it up, and what to watch out for. MCP is an open standard that lets AI assistants connect to external tools and data sources. Think of it like USB-C for AI - one standard that works across any client or model. Before MCP, every AI tool needed its own custom integration. Now a single server works with Claude, Cursor, and VS Code alike. An MCP server exposes tools (actions the AI can take) and resources (data it can read). When you ask Claude "what issues are open on my repo?", it calls the GitHub MCP server, fetches the data, and returns it in a structured format. Setup varies slightly by client: Claude Code: claude mcp add github -- npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-github Cursor: Go to Settings > MCP > Add new server, or edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json VS Code (Copilot): Add config to .vscode/mcp.json in your project folder All clients use JSON-RPC under the hood. Local servers run over stdio; remote ones use HTTP/SSE. @modelcontextprotocol/server-github | Maintained by Anthropic (official) The most-installed MCP server. Gives your AI full read/write access to GitHub - create issues, open PRs, search code, manage branches. Ask things like "create a PR for the current branch based on the diff" or "what PRs need my review?" and it just works. Security tip: Use a fine-grained personal access token scoped only to the repos you need. @upstash/context7-mcp | Maintained by Upstash Solves the biggest AI coding frustration: outdated training data. Context7 fetches current docs for any library and injects it into the AI's context. Ask ab

dev.to

Applying a Systems Engineering Framework to Agentic Coding: Why Prompts Fail and Structure Wins

Agentic AI coding tools are transforming how we build software. But they share a fundamental constraint: context windows are finite, and as chat sessions grow, AI performance degrades, a phenomenon Anthropic calls context rot. The model loses its grip on early instructions, leading to a frustrating "fix-it loop" where the agent fixes one thing but breaks another. Most of us prompt an agent, let it write code, review it, and repeat. This works beautifully for prototypes. But when you need to build a stable, full-featured product with hundreds of mission-critical acceptance criteria (AC), "vibe-coding" breaks down. The reality is that you get better behavior from agents the same way you get it from humans, by explicitly capturing what good and bad look like, and checking against it. Coming from a systems engineering background in regulated industries, I knew we needed to stop treating agents like conversational chat buddies and start treating them like engineering assets. That's why I built DevCortex: a purpose-built structured intelligence layer that brings systems engineering discipline to agentic workflows. DevCortex is an agentic development platform built on one core idea: AI agents work best when they have structured, queryable access to a database of requirements they can interrogate on demand, not a wall of text in a prompt. An Agentic-V Model Database: A structured hierarchy mapping your high-level vision (ConOps) to system specs (Specs), individual requirements (Reqs), linked defects (Issues), and an auto-generated Traceability Matrix. An MCP Server: Delivers just-in-time, high-signal context to tools like Claude Code or Open Code. Instead of dumping requirements upfront, the agent queries exactly what it needs, when it needs it. Human Control Planes (Web UI & CLI): A multi-user Web UI with real-time WebSocket feeds to watch your agent work, plus a powerful dcx CLI for power users and CI pipelines. In a recent test I compared using DevCortex and AWS Kiro to

dev.to

Why I'm Building Decision Systems Instead of Prediction Systems

Most software projects focus on producing outputs. Most AI projects focus on producing predictions. But real organizations don't operate on outputs or predictions alone. They operate on decisions. A decision has consequences. A decision creates risk. A decision consumes resources. A decision changes the future state of a system. Over the last few months, I've been studying and building systems around a simple question: How can we make decisions more explainable, auditable, and repeatable? This led me toward concepts such as: event-driven architectures Instead of asking: "Can we predict what will happen?" I'm becoming more interested in asking: "Can we explain why a decision was made?" and "Can we reproduce that decision six months later?" Current areas I'm exploring: Financial decision systems One of the projects I'm currently building is an Event-Driven Decision Logging System (EDDL), designed to explore how organizations can record, audit, and replay critical decisions over time. Still learning. Still building. Still refining my understanding of how complex systems operate under uncertainty. Looking forward to sharing the journey here. systemsdesign #architecture #backend #fintech #softwareengineering #eventdriven #riskmanagement

dev.to

How to Design an End-to-End Ansible Automation Lab with Playbooks, Inventories, Roles, Vault, Dynamic Inventory, and Custom Modules

In this tutorial, we build a complete Ansible lab that runs end-to-end in Google Colab or any Linux environment. We start by installing ansible-core, setting up a local workspace, creating an Ansible configuration file, and defining both static and dynamic inventories. We then explore key Ansible concepts, including group variables, host variables, variable precedence, ad

marktechpost.com

Data Scientist & AI Engineer โ€” Open to Full-Time Opportunities

Hey Dev.to the community, I'm Ashwin Gururaj โ€” a Data Scientist & AI Engineer based in Melbourne, Australia, currently open to full-time, contract, and internship opportunities. What I work with: Python ยท LangChain ยท LangGraph ยท FastAPI ยท RAG pipelines ยท pgvector ยท Multi-agent systems ยท LLMs ยท Groq ยท HuggingFace ยท Pydantic ยท Docker ยท Celery ยท Redis ยท PostgreSQL ยท Data Science ยท SQL ยท Pandas ยท Scikit-learn What I've built recently: Sift โ€” an open-source multi-agent fact-checking pipeline. Takes any text, extracts every factual claim, retrieves grounded evidence via HyDE RAG + live web search, and returns auditable verdicts with cited sources. Built with LangGraph, pgvector, FastAPI, and Docker. GitHub Open to: Full-time Data Scientist / AI Engineer / ML Engineer roles Remote or Melbourne-based Companies building serious AI products If you're hiring or know someone who is โ€” I'd genuinely appreciate a connection. GitHub: https://github.com/ashg2099 https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashwin-gururaj-93943816a/ Thanks!

dev.to

Weekly Dev Log 2026-W07

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ This Week Completed two more sections of the SwiftUI tutorial ๐Ÿฆพ As I continue working through the tutorial, I can feel my understanding of SwiftUI fundamentals becoming more solid๐Ÿ”ฅ It was my first time posting a standalone article about reverse engineering๐Ÿ“ If you're interested, feel free to check it out ๐Ÿ‘‡ A Curious Journey Into Reverse Engineering an AI-Generated Python .exe Umitomo May 26 #beginners #reversing #security #python 5 reactions Add Comment I started creating UI designs for my future portfolio website in Figma. I was able to roughly sketch out the overall structure of the site, but I also realized how difficult it is to create modern and stylish UI designs. (It really made me realize I donโ€™t have much design sense yet ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ’ฆ) While struggling with the design process, I came across several articles about Figma MCP. That made me interested in exploring how generative AI could help with UI design ideas, so I decided to start researching Figma MCP further. Completed Securing AI Systems room from the AI Security Learning Path on TryHackMe this week๐Ÿค– Worked through the SwiftUI tutorial and completed "Create an Algorithm for Badges" and "Add inclusive features" Posted my weekly dev log on Dev.to and a standalone article about my first attempt at reverse engineering ๐Ÿ“ Created rough portfolio website UI layouts in Figma Used shadcn/ui component library design templates in Figma Started learning UI design in Figma using community resources Completed Securing AI Systems room (part of the AI Security Learning Path) on TryHackMe. Learned that SwiftUI automatically adapts UI elements for Light and Dark Mode by default. Learned how to preview and compare Light and Dark Mode layouts in the Xcode canvas. Understood that system-provided semantic styles help SwiftUI automatically adjust UI appearance. Learned that SwiftUI uses view modifiers to customize ScrollView behavior. Understood that .scrollBounceBehavior(.basedOnSize) only enables bouncing when the content

dev.to
The Paradox of Democratized Software

The Paradox of Democratized Software

Everyone can build it. Almost no one can afford to run it at scale. And the companies selling the picks and shovels are about to get undercut by the same forces they unleashed. by VEKTOR Memory โ€” 20 min read How This Article Started: 20 Forums, 40 Headlines, and a Growing Sense That Everyone Was Confused I woke up to clear skies and the sun finally shining, and I set out to understand this idea, the truth behind it, and the nagging suspicion that the narrative around AI and software costs had become so loud, so uniform, and so confidently confusing that someone needed to sit down and actually go through it. No tweets, or are they now X's? No LinkedIn thought leader infomercials, no Substack hype, just actual research and deep thoughts. So I spent time reading, collating data. Forums, whitepapers, LinkedIn posts, Hacker News threads, VC essays, Reddit arguments. I went looking for the real signal underneath the noise. What I found instead was the full spectrum of human overconfidence, lots of moat real estate. On one end: the hype machine at full throttle. โ€œSoftware is going to zero.โ€ โ€œA solo dev can now build what a 50-person team built in 2021.โ€ โ€œThe era of the $500/month SaaS subscription is over.โ€ โ€œVibe coding will replace your entire engineering org.โ€ These headlines were everywhere. Breathless. Confident. Shared tens of thousands of times, this angle gets views, of course, the algorithm loves being fed claps, shares, comments, and reposts. Most were written by people who had a very good Tuesday with Codex, Windsurf, Claude and Cursor and decided that instant dev, open source to Github and getting oodles of stars, maybe even roping in a celebrity, was now the permanent condition of software development. โ€œWe are now famous on GitHub!" Very hipster, very vibes, see you on the playa.. On the other end: the backlash. Experienced engineer, people with 15 to 25 years in production systems are pushing back hard. โ€œShow me the vibe-coded app that survived its first real

dev.to

I Built a Local AI Agent That Thinks Like a Brain, Not a Database

I Built a Local AI Agent That Thinks Like a Brain, Not a Database Most AI agents today are sophisticated autocomplete engines. Ask them something, they answer. Ask again in a new conversation, they start from zero. The context window is the only memory they have. Serenity is different. It's a fully local AI agent that encodes experiences the way biological brains do โ€” semantically clustered, causally structured, and self-organizing. No cloud. No API calls to a vector database. No data leaves your machine. Ever. The standard approach to AI memory is essentially a hack: you stuff embeddings into a vector DB, do nearest-neighbor retrieval, and dump the results into the prompt. It sort of works. But it's not how brains work. Your brain doesn't search for memories. When one fires, related ones light up automatically. Serenity's architecture โ€” called S.E.R.A (Semantic Experience Reasoning Agent) โ€” tries to bridge that gap. Here's the key difference: Traditional Approach Serenity Vector search on embeddings Semantic node activation Prompt-injected context Persistent working memory One-shot retrieval Emergent recall via association Static embeddings Pruned & crystallized over time At the core is the Neural Node Network (NNN). Instead of storing facts in isolation, Serenity encodes experiences in causal format: ACTION โ†’ BEFORE โ†’ OUTCOME โ†’ AFTER When she learns something, she doesn't file it in a folder. She finds where it semantically belongs in a web of related concepts. Similar things cluster together โ€” the same way neurons that fire together wire together. Then the abstraction layer kicks in. Three or more related concepts crystallize into a higher-order node: the thing they all have in common that none of them says directly. Those nodes bundle into pathways. Those pathways grow into domains. She also has inhibitors and pruning โ€” weak connections get cut so strong ones sharpen. Her knowledge gets more precise over time, not noisier. What sets Serenity apart from the crowd

dev.to

The most important AI use case isn't in Silicon Valley

This is a submission for the Hermes Agent Challenge: Write About Hermes Agent The informal economy accounts for more than 60% of employment in Latin America. In Venezuela, the number is higher โ€” economists stopped agreeing on exactly how high after the formal economy contracted by 80% between 2013 and 2021. Most of that activity is not tracked in software. It's tracked in notebooks, in memory, in WhatsApp voice messages sent to a cousin who writes things down. The people running these businesses are not less intelligent than the people who use enterprise software. They just operate in an environment that enterprise software was not designed to reach... I'm Venezuelan. I know this not from a report but from El Cafetal โ€” from the abastos that stayed open through hyperinflation and blackouts, from a family that ran small businesses with worn notebooks and sharp memories, from watching a commercial ecosystem survive things that no business school case study would describe as survivable. When I started building on Claude's API, that background didn't leave me. It kept raising the same question: who is this for, and who does it never reach? The last five years of AI progress have produced extraordinary tools. Almost none of them are accessible to the majority of the world's workers. Not because the technology couldn't help them โ€” because the design assumptions exclude them before they even try. You need an account. You need a credit card, or at least a bank. You need to know what a "workspace" is, what an "integration" is, what "onboarding" means. You need English, or enough of it to navigate a settings screen. You need the time and patience to learn a new interface when the old one โ€” the notebook, the memory โ€” already works. These aren't small barriers. They are the product. When a team builds an AI tool and asks "how do we get users to set up their account," they have already decided who their users are. The person doing inventory in a Caracas abasto with a pre-paid pho

dev.to

Bizbox Build Log โ€” Week of 2026-05-30

Bizbox Build Log โ€” Week of 2026-05-30 Five substantive PRs merged this week (2026-05-23 through 2026-05-30), two releases shipped. The theme: the awaiting-human bridge grows up โ€” two merged PRs lay the provider-agnostic infrastructure (company-scoped configuration and hardened lifecycle semantics), with the ClickUp transport adapter still in review. Plus: the first Google ADK agent adapter lands, and the production VMs get a resource bump to match real workloads. Note on release tags: PRs #72, #74, and #76 merged to master on 2026-05-28 and are not yet in a tagged release at time of writing. PRs #70 and #73 shipped in v2026.525.0 and v2026.525.1 respectively. PR #72 ยท @DennisDenuto ยท merged 2026-05-28 ยท not yet in a tagged release Bizbox can now create and manage agents backed by Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK). The new adapter package covers server execution, CLI formatting, stdout parsing, and UI config/build helpers. Google ADK is registered in the shared agent-type registry, adapter registry, and capability lookup โ€” so it behaves like any other built-in adapter from the operator's perspective: create it, configure it, assign it to issues. The adapter ships with server-level tests for event parsing and execution behaviour, and the agent loadout UI was updated to include Google ADK in the configuration and new-agent flows. This is the first non-OpenClaw adapter to land in the core codebase. It opens the door to multi-runtime agent pipelines where different tasks can be routed to the best-fit execution environment. PR #76 ยท @ralphbibera ยท merged 2026-05-28 ยท not yet in a tagged release The second of two merged awaiting-human bridge PRs this week (a third, the ClickUp transport adapter PR #78, is still in review). This PR finalises the bridge lifecycle. Key changes: Interaction-scoped dedupe. Inbound events now deduplicate on (interaction_id, external_event_id) rather than just external_event_id. The same external event can be safely ignored across bridge reope

dev.to

Oracle ORA-00022 ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ์›์ธ๊ณผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์™„๋ฒฝ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ

ORA-00022 invalid session ID ๋Š”? ORA-00022 ์—๋Ÿฌ๋Š” Oracle ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์—์„œ ์„ธ์…˜ ID๊ฐ€ ์œ ํšจํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION, ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION, DBMS_SESSION ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€ ๋“ฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ด๋ฏธ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋œ ์„ธ์…˜ ID๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค๋ฌด์—์„œ๋Š” DBA๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ์„ธ์…˜์„ ๊ฐ•์ œ ์ข…๋ฃŒํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์„ธ์…˜ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜ค๋ž˜๋œ SID ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ์ด๋ฏธ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋œ ์„ธ์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ KILL SESSION ์‹œ๋„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํ”ํ•œ ์›์ธ์œผ๋กœ, DBA๊ฐ€ V$SESSION์„ ์กฐํšŒํ•˜์—ฌ SID์™€ SERIAL# ๊ฐ’์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ ํ›„ ์„ธ์…˜์„ ์ข…๋ฃŒํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ด์— ํ•ด๋‹น ์„ธ์…˜์ด ์ด๋ฏธ ์Šค์Šค๋กœ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ฟผ๋ฆฌ ์กฐํšŒ ์‹œ์ ๊ณผ ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION ๋ช…๋ น ์‹คํ–‰ ์‹œ์  ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ์„ธ์…˜ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋ฌดํšจํ™”๋˜์–ด ์ด ์—๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ž‘์—…์ด๋‚˜ ์งง์€ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์˜ ์ปค๋„ฅ์…˜ ํ’€ ์„ธ์…˜์—์„œ ํŠนํžˆ ์ž์ฃผ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 2. ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ SID ๋˜๋Š” SERIAL# ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ž…๋ ฅ ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION ๋ช…๋ น์€ SID์™€ SERIAL# ๋‘ ๊ฐ’์„ ์กฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ์…˜์„ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SID๋งŒ ๋งž๊ณ  SERIAL#์ด ํ‹€๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋‘ ๊ฐ’ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž˜๋ชป ์ž…๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Oracle์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ์„ธ์…˜์„ ์ฐพ์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ด ORA-00022๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜ํ™˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ RAC ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋Š” INST_ID(์ธ์Šคํ„ด์Šค ID)๊นŒ์ง€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ง€์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๋‹จ์ผ ์ธ์Šคํ„ด์Šค ๊ธฐ์ค€์˜ ๋ช…๋ น์„ RAC์— ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3. DBMS_SYSTEM ๋˜๋Š” DBMS_SESSION ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์‹œ ์„ธ์…˜ ์ •๋ณด ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜ DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION ๋˜๋Š” DBMS_SESSION ๊ด€๋ จ ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์ €๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์ถœํ•  ๋•Œ ์œ ํšจํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์„ธ์…˜ ID๋ฅผ ๋„˜๊ธฐ๋ฉด ORA-00022๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ž๋™ํ™” ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๋‚˜ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํˆด์—์„œ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ์…˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ์บ์‹ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์บ์‹œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐฑ์‹ ๋˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์„ธ์…˜์ด ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋˜๋ฉด ์ด ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ์…˜์„ ์ข…๋ฃŒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ์…˜ ์กด์žฌ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ , ํ™•์ธ ์ฆ‰์‹œ ๋ช…๋ น์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์Šต๊ด€์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. -- 1๋‹จ๊ณ„: ํ˜„์žฌ ํ™œ์„ฑ ์„ธ์…˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์กฐํšŒ SELECT sid, serial#, username, status, machine, program, sql_id FROM v$session WHERE status = 'ACTIVE' AND username IS NOT NULL ORDER BY sid; -- 2๋‹จ๊ณ„: ํŠน์ • ์„ธ์…˜ ์กด์žฌ ์—ฌ๋ถ€ ํ™•์ธ ํ›„ KILL DECLARE v_sid NUMBER := 123; -- ์ข…๋ฃŒํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” SID v_serial NUMBER := 4567; -- ํ•ด๋‹น SERIAL# v_count NUMBER; BEGIN -- ์„ธ์…˜์ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธ SELECT COUNT(*) INTO v_count FROM v$session WHERE sid = v_sid AND serial# = v_serial; IF v_count > 0 THEN EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION ''' || v_sid || ',' || v_serial || ''' IMMEDIATE'; DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('์„ธ์…˜ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์™„๋ฃŒ: SID=' || v_sid || ', SERIAL#=' || v_serial); ELSE DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('์„ธ์…˜์ด ์ด๋ฏธ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SID=' || v_sid); END IF; EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN IF SQLCODE = -22 THEN DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('ORA-00022: ์„ธ์…˜์ด ์ด๋ฏธ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋˜์—ˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์œ ํšจํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.'); ELSE RAISE; END IF; END; / SID์™€ SERIAL#์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์กฐํšŒํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ , RAC ํ™˜

dev.to

Claude Opus 4.8 is out. The benchmark isn't why I'm switching.

Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 4.8 today. The benchmark numbers went up, as they always do. But that's not why I'm switching my default model, and I want to explain the part that actually changed how I work. Here's the official comparison: The highlights: SWE-Bench Pro: 69.2% โ€” up from 64.3% on 4.7, well ahead of GPT-5.5 (58.6%) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (54.2%). Computer use (OSWorld-Verified): 83.4% โ€” still the model to beat for clicking around real UIs. Knowledge work (GDPval-AA): 1890 vs 1769 for GPT-5.5. Reasoning (Humanity's Last Exam): 49.8% no tools / 57.9% with tools โ€” top of the table. And one I'll call out honestly: on Terminal-Bench 2.1, Opus 4.8 scores 74.6% and GPT-5.5 wins at 78.2%. 4.8 jumped a lot from its predecessor (66.1%), but it isn't first on that one. Pick your model for what you actually do. Opus 4.8 is roughly 4x less likely than 4.7 to let a code flaw pass without flagging it. It proactively points out uncertainty, questions sketchy inputs, and pushes back on plans it thinks are unsound. That sounds small. It isn't. When you hand work to an agent, raw capability was never the real bottleneck โ€” silent failure was. The model that writes a subtle off-by-one and says nothing costs you more than the model that's slightly worse but says "I'm not sure this input is ever non-null, can you confirm?" Concretely: Before: it writes a function that looks clean, ships a hidden edge-case bug, says nothing. You find it in production. After: it writes the same function and adds "there's an edge case here I'm not confident about โ€” double-check the input is non-empty," or flat-out tells you your plan has a hole. For anyone treating Claude as a coworker that ships work unattended, that calibrated honesty is worth more than a few benchmark points. Dynamic Workflows (Claude Code research preview) โ€” runs hundreds of parallel subagents for big jobs like migrating a codebase across hundreds of thousands of lines. Effort control (claude.ai, Cowork) โ€” you pick how hard it t

dev.to

You vibe code. Aigent.ly handles the vulnerabilities.

I kept seeing vibe coders ship vulnerabilities they didn't write AI coding tools are incredible. Cursor, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot โ€” they let you build faster than ever. But there's a quiet problem nobody's talking about: Your AI coding tool's security context goes stale. Fast. New CVEs drop daily. Your AI doesn't know about them. So it keeps suggesting patterns and dependencies that were safe last month โ€” and aren't anymore. You ship. The vulnerability ships with you. So I built Aigent.ly Aigent.ly is an open-source vulnerability prevention layer that sits between you and your AI coding tool. It keeps your tool's security context current โ€” so when you vibe code, you're not unknowingly shipping yesterday's CVEs. What it does: Monitors your AI coding tool's security context in real time Who it's for If you use Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, or any AI coding tool and you ship fast โ€” this is for you. Security shouldn't slow you down. Aigent.ly makes it invisible. Try it / contribute ๐Ÿ”— GitHub: Aigently MCP/Catalog This is early. I'd love feedback from other builders โ€” what's missing, what's broken, what you'd want next. Drop a comment or open an issue.

dev.to

Opening Your SaaS to AI Agents Over MCP: Hold the Reins on the Server Side

There is a moment, when you decide to open your SaaS to AI agents over MCP, where the ground shifts under two of your oldest assumptions at once. The first assumption is that your data stays inside your walls. With MCP, the result of any tool call passes once through the user's chat screen โ€” which means it passes through an external AI vendor's processing infrastructure on the way to the user. That is data sovereignty, and for finance, healthcare, audit, and HR it has historically been the reason to keep everything inside a built-in dashboard. The second assumption is that the only actor writing to your system is a person you authenticated, or your own code. Open over MCP and an external agent becomes a write-capable actor on someone's behalf. The agent reads instructions from its context window, and that context can be poisoned. OWASP lists prompt injection as the number-one AI-related security risk for a reason: a quiet malicious instruction can steer a model into operations it should never perform. Both of those sound like reasons not to open up. They are not. They are reasons to design the server side so that opening up is safe by construction. The whole game is to hold the reins on the server side, so that no matter what the external AI decides, it can only move inside the range you permitted. This article is about the three reins, plus the tool design that makes them work. When you wrap your product as an MCP server, you stop deciding what happens. The user's AI client decides what to attempt. You decide what is allowed to succeed. That single reframe is the difference between a safe MCP surface and a dangerous one. If your security model assumes the caller is well-behaved, you have lost. If your security model assumes the caller will try anything and your server is the thing that says no, you are in good shape. The good news, and the reason the industry's walls are coming down, is that you mostly already have the machinery. The permission systems SaaS teams s

dev.to

Why I chose MCP over RAG for live infrastructure auditing

I've been working on a project to audit distributed hardware infrastructure โ€” devices I was testing the agent against a scenario where a device had failed a firmware check at Here's the reframe that changed how I thought about this. server that exposes it as tools the agent can call: One thing I'd push back on in most agent tutorials โ€” they wire the LLM directly to the This is the piece I'm most glad I built, and the one I almost skipped. The agent can suggest remediation โ€” here's the CLI command to fix the firmware drift Two things. RAG is the right tool for knowledge retrieval over static content. It's a less natural fit when your agent needs to query live structured data and act on what it finds. MCP let me give the agent real database access through a typed tool interface โ€” no embedding pipeline, no staleness, no similarity search on what is fundamentally a relational query. For infrastructure audit, that was the right call. Code is on GitHub if you want to dig into the architecture. Happy to go deeper on the LangGraph state machine or the Judge design in the comments.

dev.to

I built a premium AI Dashboard UI Template with clean file separation. Offering it 100% FREE!

Hey fellow devs! ๐Ÿ‘‹ I've been experimenting a lot with Vibe Coding lately, trying to see how far we can push AI code generation when guided by strict architectural rules. Today, Iโ€™m releasing my second template: AI Dashboard Pro. Unlike standard messy, single-file AI outputs, this layout is completely production-ready. I explicitly forced the generation into a clean Separation of Concerns layout (semantic HTML5, isolated CSS animation layer, and functional modular JS). Dynamic Glowing Interactions: Neon gradients that smoothly track the cursor position across elements. Live Telemetry Simulation: Real-time visual data fluctuations built purely with vanilla JS performance loops (no heavy un-licensed external libraries). Client-Side Live Filtering: Instant live text searching inside rows and logs. index.html (Semantic Layout) css/style.css (Tailwind Configured Aesthetics) js/dashboard.js (Core Telemetry & Filter Logic) It's 100% responsive, built with Tailwind CSS via CDN, and fully licensed under the MIT open-source guidelines (completely safe for commercial projects). Iโ€™m giving this away for FREE to the community to help you speed up your next SaaS MVP build, or just to play around with the code structure. ๐Ÿ‘‡ Grab the source code here: https://steven-codes.lemonsqueezy.com/checkout/buy/5d1ecb2e-22b1-45f1-9412-e158366f2603 ] Would love to hear your feedback on the code organization in the comments below! If you found it helpful, a heart/unicorn reaction would mean the world to me. ๐Ÿš€

dev.to

Get AI & Machine Learning delivered to your inbox

Owl Post delivers a personalized ai & machine learning digest every morning, curated by AI, written in your voice.

Get your free digest
See a sample AI & Machine Learning digest โ†’
More in Technology