News & Policy

U.S. News

Policy, politics, and what's happening nationally

Stories
200
stories
Sources
40
sources
Page
Page 4 of 10
Updated hourly

Why Owl Post covers U.S. News

U.S. news coverage runs hot and often partisan. Understanding what actually happened in Washington, in the courts, or in a federal agency usually requires reading past the headline and well into the second day of reporting.

Owl Post pulls from outlets across the political spectrum and reads the primary sources directly: the legislative text, the court opinion, the regulatory filing, the agency guidance. What a bill actually does is often different from what its supporters and opponents claim it does. What a court ruling actually holds is often narrower than either side wants to acknowledge. Owl Post reads for what happened, presents context from multiple angles, and trusts you to draw your own conclusions.

Read the full U.S. News briefing

The beat covers federal legislation and the congressional process, Supreme Court and significant appellate decisions, regulatory actions from the major agencies, and national stories with genuine policy implications. Owl Post is not a wire service and is not trying to catch every development. It is trying to make sure you understand the ones that matter, with enough context that the significance lands.

How you prefer to process political and policy news shapes the digest you receive. If you want the analytical, policy-framing register that names the mechanism and the stakes without editorializing, your digest reads that way. If you want a more efficient briefing style, that works too. Both sides are represented in the sourcing either way.

A daily U.S. news digest. Policy, institutions, and the national stories worth understanding, not just knowing about. The goal is to read the news in a way that leaves you with a clearer picture of what is happening rather than just a higher level of anxiety about it.

When AI is subject to less regulation than your fridge, something is startlingly wrong | Richard Hermer

Let’s be clear: the risk to humanity is unprecedented. Without an urgent public debate and robust use of international law, we will lose control of the future In my two years as attorney general, I spent more time working on national security than any other issue. The range and gravity of the threats posed to our nation are multifold, from terrorism, armed conflicts and nuclear proliferation, to the impacts of financial insecurity and the climate crisis. All profound challenges, yet ones our superb intelligence and defence communities are well placed to counter. The risk from AI is of an altogether different magnitude, not only in scale, but also because there is a limited time window to address it. The risk is difficult to overestimate: it poses an existential risk to humanity. The lights are flashing red and we must act now before it’s too late. Although the extraordinary threats posed by AI have long been flagged by those closely involved in its creation, it was not until very recently, after the disclosure of the Hugging Face hack and the resignation of Jacob Coxon from Anthropic, that the issue at last started to gain traction in the public discourse. This moment is an opportunity, and to capitalise on it we desperately need increased urgency in international coordination to regulate frontier AI. There must also be meaningful public engagement with how AI should be shaped to benefit humanity, rather than entrench the power of a few. We cannot leave this to China, the US and big tech – we must all demand a voice in the debate.

theguardian.comLeft

Get U.S. News delivered to your inbox

Owl Post delivers a personalized u.s. news digest every morning, curated by AI, written in your voice.

Get your free digest
More in News & Policy
Explore other beats
From the Owl Post blog