Culture & More

Entertainment

Movies, TV, music, and what's worth your time

Stories
200
stories
Sources
19
sources
Page
Page 2 of 10
Updated hourly

Why Owl Post covers Entertainment

Entertainment coverage skews toward whatever the algorithm wants to surface this week. The shows nobody is watching that turn out to be the year's best television, the album that quietly reset a genre with no press cycle behind it, the film that earned its reputation through word of mouth rather than marketing spend: these are harder to find in a media landscape optimized for volume.

Owl Post reads entertainment with an eye toward what is actually worth your attention rather than what is loudest. That means tracking the streaming landscape critically, including which platforms are producing work that justifies the subscription and which are coasting. It means following music across genres rather than just chart activity. It means covering film with attention to what is in theaters and what is being overlooked. And it means following the business layer of entertainment, including the studio decisions, streaming economics, and industry shifts that determine what gets made and what does not.

Read the full Entertainment briefing

The beat spans film (theatrical and streaming), television across all platforms, music across genres, and the cultural conversations that form around all of them. Owl Post reads serious film and television criticism, music journalism with genuine editorial standards, and the entertainment business press that covers the industry economics behind the content.

Your digest adapts to your relationship with entertainment criticism. If you want the opinionated, take-a-position voice that tells you what is good and makes a case for it, that framing is available. If you want the recommendation-first approach that answers what to watch and what to skip without extensive argumentation, that works too.

A daily entertainment digest. What is worth your time, what the industry is doing, and what the culture is talking about.

Featured

The Social Reckoning isn’t as angry or as potent as a Facebook drama should be

Aaron Sorkin’s attempt to return to the success of The Social Network is a strangely dated and incomplete look at a world that needs a sharper eye In retrospect, David Fincher’s 2010 film The Social Network was a landmark for a quiet, even counterintuitive reason. Before the film was released, some questioned whether Aaron Sorkin, a writer not exactly known for his mastery of, nevermind obsession with, the technical sphere, was the right man to tell the origin story of Facebook. And while Sorkin may well have converted Mark Zuckerberg into terms he could better understand – namely, a motormouthed wiseass who deep down wants to impress a smart, serious-minded girl – he and Fincher also made one of the first internet-centric movies to treat online life as a natural extension of IRL dynamics, rather than the otherworldly tech portal seen in so many 90s internet movies. Granted, that’s the whole deal with Facebook: its viral spread of social networking, something so simple and addictive that aunts, grandpas and coworkers everywhere could understand it. Yet understanding its simultaneous extension and distortion of the real world wasn’t a given; four years later, for example, 2014’s Men, Women and Children was widely derided for taking an alarmist approach to the internet as a haven for adults seeking an affair, teenagers nursing porn addictions and fame-hungry strivers of all ages. The Social Network, on the other hand, is remarkably nonjudgmental about the basic mechanics of Facebook, rooting its nascent flaws in the human weaknesses that birthed it. In retrospect, the movie only feels outdated to the extent that it underestimates Zuckerberg’s grasping for power and the potential for grim carelessness that his online kingdom was built on.

theguardian.comLeft

The Girl in the River review – forensic psychologist police procedural thriller plays like noir parody

Ralph Macchio and Tiffany Haddish feature in a ropey and implausible manhunt thriller as cops search for the missing twin of a murdered teenager This small-town police thriller sets its stall out intriguingly, with a murder that seems actively begging to be solved. The perp chose to dump his victim – the 14-year-old daughter of a local political bigwig – into a part of the Mississippi River where she was likely to resurface, and from a highly visible bridge. When veteran detective Alan Kramer (Devon Sawa) and rookie forensic psychologist Amelia Pembrock (Maggie Grace) show up to investigate, they are immediately alerted to a gun in the bushes just yards away. As a colleague observes: “This isn’t a clean-up. It’s a message.” But Brando Benetton’s debut film sadly fails to capitalise on the misdirection at play in this open-goal crime scene. Instead of using it to pry open community secrets, he gives us a ropey and implausible manhunt. As Kramer and Pembrock race to locate the girl’s twin, who is presumably still in the killer’s clutches, they zero in on local butcher Boris (Darron Dunbar). He has a sex-pest rap sheet and lives with his mother – which apparently ticks all the boxes for a profiling genius such as Pembrock. Kramer pulls her up for being unbothered by the lack of actual prosecutable evidence. But carping is about the only investigative contribution this seasoned criminologist makes here (and what’s a criminologist – a crime sociologist – doing out in the field anyway?).

theguardian.comLeft

Cheesy? Yes. Cringe? Absolutely. That’s why High School Musical is still our secret passion | Rachel Chang

I watched the filming of the first jazz-hands epic. Two decades on, its sparkle hasn’t faded – and now it’s back on the London stage Whenever I watch basketball, I come away disappointed that the players’ shoe squeaks didn’t jumpstart a choreographed dance number, just like in High School Musical. Whether it was a lunch break turning into a confession of closeted passions or a pep rally evolving into a flashmob, the 2006 Disney Channel movie proved that teen drama can always be solved through song. Quality entertainment? Meh. The corniest of lines? Oh, for sure. But the cheesiness was the point. Its 98 minutes became a deliciously enduring slice of pop culture not despite the cringe, but because the film embraced it so wholeheartedly. Rachel Chang is a journalist and author specialising in travel and pop culture. Her book Unforgettable Walks: 52 Places to Stroll Around the World is published next year

theguardian.comLeft

Get Entertainment delivered to your inbox

Owl Post delivers a personalized entertainment digest every morning, curated by AI, written in your voice.

Get your free digest
More in Culture & More
Explore other beats
From the Owl Post blog